Die Spitzbuben sind fertig. Noch etwas liegen lassen und dann geht es in die Dose.
you know why that camera is located right next to the screen? because looking into a sensor doesn't help anybody.
nobody looks into the camera! IF it looks like they do, then only because there's nice tricks to enable that look.
Judge them for using selfie mode instead of a decent setup!
mostly 80s+, while 50+% is from past 2000
some metal or stuff like pink floyd, kraftwerk or even something NDW might be older
#Elsevier finally (after 25 years) retracted the primary study concluding that #glyphosate is safe for humans. Glyphosate is the active ingredient in #Roundup herbicide and manufactured by #Monsanto.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230099913715
h/t @civodul.
https://fediscience.org/@civodul@toot.aquilenet.fr/115661046263238211
Among the grounds for the retraction:
* "The article's conclusions…are solely based on unpublished studies from Monsanto."
* "Employees of Monsanto may have contributed to the writing of the article without proper acknowledgment as co-authors."
* "The authors may have received [undisclosed] financial compensation from Monsanto for their work on this article."
Remember that in 2020, the #Trump #EPA "relied almost entirely on #Monsanto studies" to conclude that Roundup was safe.
https://x.com/petersuber/status/1224039859272212480
In 2016, Monsanto made a show of sharing its research on glyphosate with the public. But instead of making it #OpenAccess, it put print copies in a room in Brussels, required registration to use the room, and then closed the room after two months.
https://web.archive.org/web/20190119214350/https://plus.google.com/+PeterSuber/posts/ioy1fVqaLy1
Two questions for follow up studies:
1. Why did Elsevier's 𝘙𝘦𝘨𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘺 𝘛𝘰𝘹𝘪𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘺 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘗𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘺 need 25 years to retract this piece of Monsanto advertising?
2. What harm did the article cause during the last 25 years?
Shout out to @katemorley for the excellent guide on how to make HTML lists display as expandable/collapsable trees using nothing but CSS. https://iamkate.com/code/tree-views/
depol
Geld, das an #Microsoft geht, ist wirklich mehr als verschenkt. Es ist verloren und die "Gegenleistung" ist eine zynische Ausnutzung und undemokratische Fremdsteuerung grundlegender Vorgänge.
Das Geld gehört in demokratisch kontrollierte, öffentliche Infrastruktur, deren stabilen Betrieb und deren Entwicklung nach demokratische ausgehandelten Vorgaben.
Die Alternative zu "Public money, public code" ist Kontrollverlust.
Before I was married, I kept men's names in my phone as <First name> von <Location> like "Bill von Colchester" or "Rob von Enfield." Husband found an old phone of mine w/ 12 David von Somethings and he hasn't spoken to me since. His name is David von <city where we first fucked>.
Violence, Uber Eats
“Das erse Mal, dass Uber Eats in Deutschland von einem Streik betroffen war. Ohne Gewerkschaften, organisiert in einer WA-Gruppe mit 700 Fahrern. Zwei Tage lieferten sie keine Bestellungen aus. Ein Schlägertrupp prügelte einen der Anführer krankenhausreif“_ https://www.rbb24.de/wirtschaft/beitrag/2025/12/essenslieferdienste-subunternehmer-arbeitsbedingungen.html
Durch diese Waffe stirbt alle 25 Sekunden ein Mensch. Jedes Jahr ca. 1,3 Millionen weltweit.
Umso konsequenter wir gegen all die hochmotorisierten BMWs, Audis und Porsches vorgehen, desto schneller werden unsere Straßen wieder sicher. #Autogewalt #Verkehrswende #VisionZero #StadtpanzerRaus
Fangen ja schon früh an:
"Elfjähriger sprengte sich Finger weg"
Wendekreis wird etwas hoch, aber durch den normalen Straßenverkehr sollte ich damit kommen. (Gartentore und so sind schwieriger)
Mal sehen ob ich mir irgendwo billig einen Fahrrad-Dachgepäck-Bügel klicken kann und den auf die 20mm-Rohre geschraubt bekomme?
Dann wäre das vmtl. die billigste Variante um Kind UND Kinderfahrrad für längere Strecken mitzunehmen?
Lots of voices like “we need European social media!!”
And I said, “actually, you know what, we kind of have one for years…” 😆
Some people started complaining “but nobody uses Mastodon” and I once again had no choice but to explain that if “nobody uses” then how come I’ve got 3k+ followers here and engaging in truly interesting discussions not less often than there😁
There’s two data points where Fediverse can be indeed seen as less attractive than US cortisol aggregators:
• number of engagements, but granted that up to 60-70% of these on Twitter are generated by bots who cares? Maybe media advertising agencies do, but I don’t.
• presence of public persons - this is where Fediverse actually loses, because it’s a network that grows between them and can’t be “invited”