meta-post about content warnings
By the way, what exactly is going on with people writing their content warnings in the text of the post?
If you write "spoiler for XYZ" into the content note field, I can close your post and not read the spoiler.
If you write it into the normal body text, I either have to continuously actively avoid looking at your post (which is annoying as fuck) or I'll have to mute you. Guess what it'll be.
Same goes for stuff that might be triggering etc.
@scy there is that one single thing that makes those things in body better than that dedicated CW-field
filtering works 'better' on tags than on CWs (even if that still doesn't work well, but… 'it's not complete trash')
Neither tag nor CW-field? Yeah,idk whats wrong with those either.
filtering works 'better' on tags than on CWs (even if that still doesn't work well, but… 'it's not complete trash')
Neither tag nor CW-field? Yeah,idk whats wrong with those either.
- replies
- 0
- announces
- 0
- likes
- 1
meta-post about content warnings
@scy They might not be posting from Mastodon